Samyang 20mm f/1.8 ED AS UMC Handling and Features. ? Optical Design: 14 Elements in 12 Groups vs 13 Elements in 10 Groups. The 20mm and 24mm are both f/1.4 while the 14mm is f/1.8. I still am not to sure just what to invest in? been able to manage well, I don't see the pictures in my mind's eye. And, for the last two years I have loved this lens: I’ve used it for weddings, for architectural photography, portraits, and of course for Landscape Astrophotogoraphy. It’s entirely possible better lenses won’t have this distortion, and I should definitely rent a lens before I buy it. You should pre-visualize what you like in compositions and subject matter and determine that way. For wide l like 35 to 20 the most and find going any wider happens less often but when the need is there it's nice to have the super wide. Because, if there are any lens distortions it’d be hard to crop them out. Personally I prefer zooms for landscapes and primes for pictures of people. 1. In my own case I use my 20/21mm a lot more than my 24mm in landscape, but some guys shooting with me a lot hardly use 20mm and prefer 24-35mm range, so which FL is " better"? This is noticeably more expensive than the film-era 35mm F1.8 lenses of yore, but as we'll see, just like the recently-reviewed Nikon Z 35mm F1.8 S, it belongs to a new generation in more ways than just one.. Look at the Milky Way photo at the bottom of the post. The 25 mm f/1.7 is 52 mm long, almost 61 mm in diameter, and the filter mount is 46 mm. In our latest buying guide we've selected some cameras that might be a bit older but still offer a lot of bang for the buck. I’d rather just frame the shot in camera and not lose any megapixels when I crop down the 14mm lens. I really enjoy the idea of a f/1.8 aperture but at a $700 premium over the 20mm. Many of mine are around 100mm and stitched together basically to make angles of view of the classic standard lens. It’s pretty much the 14-30mm f/4, the 20mm f/1.8, or adapted lenses. The Nikon Z 20mm f1.8 S is an ultra wide-angle prime lens for Nikon’s Z-series mirrorless cameras of DX or FX format: on a cropped body like the Z50 the lens is equivalent in angle-of-view and depth-of-field to a 30mm f2.8 lens. If you shoot people the 24mm is more versatile. Much of the time this creates super bland, boring images that the photographer themselves love because the gear nerd in them is impressed at "exotic" looking image, but regular people go "sh*t I knew I shouldn't have left home without my magnifying glass." My suggestion is that you go with the 24mm and use it sparingly. Naturally, a 35mm lens offers a wider view of the subject, which makes it perhaps a little more versatile of the two. If you’re wondering about the bokeh of a 14-30mm f/4 lens, then you might be considering the wrong lens. I have my D3300 as my main day to day lightweight camera, I use my kit 18 55 VR Ii and the 35 1.8 DX,  for my zoos and some wildlife my D7100 with my Nikon 80 400 VR I, That leaves my D700 to use as a street and special use camera for landscape, I'm liquidating my zooms and plan on a 3 or 4 lens set of primes. I would suggest the 24 to be most useful. If you are looking into buying a great 35mm, I would recommend the new Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art Lens. My Case for a New Lens. The 14-24mm f2.8 is better than any prime in its range and the only difficulty other than bulk and weight is the use of filters. If the image quality for this lens lives up to the reputation of previous Art lenses, it’… On the corners of my photos, the stars turn into streaks. It’s not too tight for narrow spaces in street photography. I highly recommend this lens to anyone in the market for an ultra-wide, ultra-fast lens. Of greater importance to me, the 60mm f/2.8 is dust-resistant and splash-resistant. Before I got the 70-200 f4 my most used landscape lens was the 105mm micro. Couple that with shutter speed, the 14mm lens makes a really good case for itself. I feel like this lens is the sweet spot in the focal range line up. Read our review to find out. The distortion. It still is a good lens but falls behind Nikon’s new Z Nikkor especially regarding sharpness in the DX image-circle. So, if I were to get the 14mm f/1.8, I’d probably still be shooting at f/2.8, maybe a tad faster like f/2.0 or f/2.4. Especially at the 30mm end, this lens makes a great full-body portrait lens choice. As you can see, the wide-angle 24mm lens captures a lot more white-space around the props. Each has there own desire of perspective. Compared to Nikon 20mm f1.8G . Tokina obviously thought along the same lines and released two lenses here - the Tokina FíRIN 20mm f/2 FE AF and MF for Sony FE mount. If you don’t know why 35mm vs 50mm is important, then this article is for you. It’s pretty tight. The 24 handles more like the 28. Focal length: 30mm (60mm in 35mm terms) Lens configuration: 7 elements / 6 groups with 1 Aspherical ED element, 1 DSA lens element and 1 Aspherical glass element Lens mechanism: Inner focus with screw drive mechanism Angle of view: 40° Closest focusing distance: 0.095m Maximum image magnification: 1.25x (Micro Four Thirds) / 2.5x (35mm … The next one on Nikon’s schedule is the first “pro” ultra-wide Z lens, a 14-24mm f/2.8 S. So, if you want to use your Nikon Z6 or Z7 with an ultra-wide right now, you don’t have many options. Stops down to f/22-29. It’s another lens I’m pretty comfortable with. But, if I were to base decisions entirey off this rule I’d always want to consider wider lenses, such as an 12 or even an 8mm. The Tamron is huge at 98 x 143 mm (3.9 x 5.6in.) Panasonic Lumix 20mm Vs 20mm II Lens Comparison Review Reviews / We compare the two Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 lenses to see if there are any additional benefits with the new version II lens. The GFX 100S fits most of the capabilities of the GFX 100 into a smaller and more affordable body. The lens has seven aperture blades and uses two aspherical lenses and a lens that consists of glass with an ultra-high refractive index to prevent color errors. Which prime lens is better 35mm or 50mm? Keep in mind though, that the 40mm is an EF lens while the 24mm is an EF-S lens. Sony 20mm f/1.8 G Lens Review and Comparison with Zeiss Batis 18mm f/2.8. The 14mm is still my favorite. As for 20mm vs 24mm it depends on how much you like to play with proportions. 20 is a bit more specialist - though great for landscapes where you want both foreground and background  features. Only with very wide angle lenses would you notice much of a difference with a few mm. For the sake of disclosure, I’m considering these three lenses in the Sigma ART lineup. I’ve been photographing with a 14mm lens for the last two years. Amazon IT. The larger the size of the lens, the more narrow and zoomed in the field of view is. These two shots are taken withthe same exact camera and subject position, just with a 24mm lens then a 14mm lens. Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100), Shedding some light on the sources of noise, http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/lens/simulator/, http://www.flickr.com/photos/hafan_storth/, Nikon AF-S Nikkor 120-300mm F2.8E FL ED SR VR sample gallery, Hands-on with the latest Nikon Z lenses, AF-S 120-300mm F2.8, Nikon AF-S 120-300mm F2.8E FL ED SR VR arrives next month for $9500, Fujifilm X-E4 pre-production sample gallery, Tamron 17-70 F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD field review, The night the sea turned green, Iceland by Xshooter. But, that said, I think this lens is too wide for landscape astrophotography as well. Often times I just go out whenever I have time and photograph the night sky, and even if I plan a shot I arrive an hour or so early, so I have all the time in the world to focus my shot. I’ve been photographing with a 14mm lens for the last two years. If you do any type of photography in which bokeh is important, then even at 30mm and f/4, you’re not going to get that much background blur unless you’re getting pretty close to your subjects. If you look at this simulator: http://imaging.nikon.com/lineup/lens/simulator/ and compare 20 and 24mm settings you'll see there's not that much difference between their FOVs. 7 rounded blades. For the former consider stitching (several of my Flickr pics are just that - The church at West Wycombe and Smail's in Morpeth were too wide for my 24mm lens and are hand held stitches). Click through to see our picks. Compared to its predecessor the new lens should perform similarly, but we measured some slight variation in optical quality. I have also gone with the Fuji as well. Above (from left to right): Nikon Z 14-30mm f4.0 S, Nikon Z 20mm f1.8 S, Nikon AF-S 20mm f1.8G on FTZ-adapter. Its a phenomenal lens and costs less than the name brand ones. On an ASP-C/1.5x sensor format body, the 20mm focal length provides an angle of view similar to a 30mm lens on a full-frame sensor format body with an angle of view just slightly narrower than the 28mm example shared above.The 30mm angle of view is only moderately wide and just wider than the ultra-popular and very useful 35mm focal length. You cannot always zoom with your feet when it comes to landscapes and while the the 18-35G isn't as good as the 20 or 24, it is excellent and will allow you to get some shots you would not be able to get were you confining yourself to a single focal length. The FE 35mm F1.8 is the priciest of the bunch, at $750. Something often overlooked is that shorter focal lengths not only increase the field of view but they also distort perspective more making objects in the background look much smaller, turning mountains into distant hills. I suspect getting this genre to work well means a tripod and if you are less than 100% mobile that is another issue. It’s not a 35mm or a 50mm but 24 can be pretty restrictive in terms of frame. For the quality of photos this lens delivers, it’s a no brainer. 109º ～ 70º diagonal, on DX. Both shots are taken with the aperture as fast as it’ll go, with a shutter at 30s, and an ISO of 3200. I find my 20 works well as long as I have access to 24 or 28 range but if I didn't then I would certainly choose the 24 which I think would cover more aspects. (if there were such a lens) But getting an exact match is not really necessary. Especially with the fast f/1.4 aperture. Angle of View specifications top. It also has VR and for landscape, the distortion at 16mm isn't that big of a problem. But, the difference in light between the 1.4 and 1.8 isn’t as dramatic. If you prefer more realistic proportions choose the 24mm. This means you need probably at least three sets of filters, maybe four (I’d probably handle the 72 and 77 requirements with a 77mm filter and 72-77mm step-up ring.) I currently use a Nikon 20 35 2.8 zoom,[all my gear is mostly old AF and AF D lenses] 2nd is my 35 70 2.8 and a 70 210 D zoom, I'm really satisfied with these lenses, its just they're old and a prime just might challenge me to be better. This is false and misleading. Amazon UK. sony 30mm f/2.8 (slower but wider) I have used the 50mm lens before and its sharp. The 20mm and 24mm are about $900, while the 14mm is almost twice that. I know what will be include in the frame and how to make the scene look as natural as possible. It shows some light falloff in the corners. 0.2m vs 0.3m; Has a silent focus motor built into the lens? While it would be a great lens to have, there are better lenses out there for other purposes. Sony's FE 35mm F1.4 GM is an impressively sharp and long-awaited pro-level 35mm optic for full-frame Sony E-mount cameras. Home > Comparatif: objectif photo > Sigma 20mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art vs Sigma 30mm F1.4 DC HSM A. The only reason I don’t stop down my current 14mm, is that I don’t want to shoot at f/4.0. If you are shooting in tight spaces and interiors the 20mm might be better. All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998 - 2021 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. There are two drastic changes here. I've been shooting on Sony E mount cameras since 2012. Nikon 10-20mm. The Nikon AF-S 20mm f1.8G ED came Recommended in my review from 2014. Trotti photographed the same model using her Canon 5D Mark III and every prime lens she owns: a Sigma 24mm f/1.4, Canon 35mm f/1.4, Canon 50mm f/1.2, Canon 85mm f/1.2, and Canon 135mm f/2. That’s not say I’ve gotten awesome landscape astronomy photos with this focal length, this lens just won’t adequely capture the scale of the Milky Way in the landscape. The three primes, 20, 35, and 60 macro will actually weigh in slightly more than the zoom but will gain less weight on camera with a bit better image quality. The distance gets very compressed, small for open scenics. The angle of lens section also relies on the image sensor chip. I would suggest you go with the 18-35mm G for landscape. The only real answer to this is "it depends what focal length you prefer". So how does it perform? It's a wash though. A 24mm lens can only photograph a 20 second photo, but since I like to shoot under that time limit, I’d select 15s. It’s a bit different with landscape astrophotography. As I liquidate older equipment, including lenses and cameras, I'm leaning towards more landscape work, not Yellowstone, or Yosemite, just light duty here in Southern Indiana. A quick lesson before I continue: A Full Stop is 1.4x from the last stop. So, it’s faster than the 14mm. 9 rounded blades. At least at my latitude, 14mm maybe too wide. I just had a surgery, and feeling much better. I find these statements a bit contradictory. 94º diagonal on full-frame. Autofocus. With a 50MP sensor, it gives you tons of resolution, but it also lets you fire off burst images at 30 fps for fast action sports. Amazon FR. I’d be able to shoot at ISO 1600 or even 800 if I shot wide open. Along the same lines, the dimensions of the 14-30mm lens make it an easier lens to handle than the f/2.8. In this video I compare Sigma 20mm f1.4 to Sony 20mm f1.8 lenses side by side. The Sony a7S III is a 12MP full-frame camera primarily designed with video in mind. The Lumix G 20mm f/1.7 pancake lens has a traditional focus mechanism, pushing all the lens elements back and forth. So if you shooting in those conditions by all means use a 1.8G or 1.4 prime. These may not look all that different because I went ahead and reframed each shot so that it was still interesting. Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G. bigger. Reading Time: 10 min read 24. lens. General Nikon Z 20mm F1.8 S Nikon Z 24mm F1.8 S; Brand: Nikon: … Stops down to f/22. Ever since the Sigma 16mm 1.4 DC DN Lens was announced back in November last year, many folks have been wondering how does it hold up against its older sibling the Sigma 30mm 1.4 DC DN Lens.Since both counterparts share the same build quality and ultra-fast maximum aperture, it seems that the decision becomes even more overwhelming. In this buying guide we’ve rounded up all the current interchangeable lens cameras costing over $2500 and recommended the best. This means that my 50mm is really about a 75mm on my camera and my new 20mm is about a 30mm. The Tamron 20mm f2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 is an ultra-wide prime lens for Sony’s E-mount mirrorless cameras and corrected for full-frame use. So some thoughts on which focal length makes the better landscape lens, 20 or 24? For this reason 24mm is the shortest prime lens I use other than a 16mm fisheye. It’s part of a three lens series from Tamron all of which have the distinguishing feature of a maximum magnification of 1:2. Two, it’s a pretty drastic field of view reduction, infact the 14mm captures roughly 302.25% more of the scene than the 24mm lens. Kit vs. That said I just got the 20 and the 24 is on my short list. It’s a tidy wide. Focal length: 20mm (30mm in 35mm equivalent terms) Lens configuration: 6 elements in 6 groups; Lens coating: N/A; Angle of view: 70° Minimum focusing distance: 20cm; Magnification: 0.12x; Aperture blades: 7 circular blades; Aperture range: 2.8 to 16; Filter diameter: 49mm; Weather-sealing: N/A; Optical stabilisation: N/A; Dimensions: 62.6 x 20.4mm; Weight: 69g; Design and ease of use. It is an adequate lens. Part of me would really hate losing all that space. However, it’s also an expensive lens. Also could someone please explain which is more preferable for which situation (30mm vs 50mm). One peeve with all the f/1.8 lenses I have that relates to handling is the differing filter size: 77, 72, 67, 58, 58, and 67 for the 20mm, 24mm, 28mm, 35mm, 50mm, and 85mm respectively. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for travel and recommended the best.